The 400 acres that Mamata Banerjee has been crying hoarse about is not the issue. It is not the 997 acres that has been allotted to Tata Motors by the West Bengal government that is the real issue. It is not about the Rs.1500 crore investment that Tata Motors has made for the plant. Nor is this issue about the 56 vendors of Tata Motors that have set up shop around what was to come up as the mother plant for Nano in Singur. It is also not about the Rs 350 crore hit that Tata Motors is going to take if the plant and machinery were to be shifted out of Singur. This is now about calling the bluff of politicians, and it does appear that Ratan Tata has succeeded in doing that.
The Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee has been insistent that the agitation against Tata will continue till the 400-acre land is not returned to the farmers. This is not a contiguous piece of land that the fiery Bengali leader is fighting for. Some of this currently being occupied by the vendors and some of it also has the Tata Motors facilities, which are part of the plant.
If the land around the plant is not contiguous, how can an industrial unit function smoothly is beyond comprehension. There is nothing in the history books that indicates that Mamata Banerjee has any experience of having worked in the automobile industry, or having run a company in the past. That begs the question - how can a political leader decide how an industrial unit is to be organised and run?
A number of leaders from the automobile industry leaders have spoken out for the need to let the Nano project go ahead, with the image of the industry and the country in mind. Other industry leaders and industry associations have tried to reason against Mamata's public stand. Global media, eagerly looking forward to an Indian automobile company making history, have taken note of how the project is threatened because of "opposition from farmers" in Singur. How can the collective thinking of so many not be better than one leader's?
This fierce opposition from Mamata has to be seen in the context of the 31-year long rule of CPM in the state. The Congress party has failed to break the Left stranglehold over these years. Mamata has been one firebrand leader who's seen as someone who could turn the tables and break the Left citadel. That again begs the question - at what cost to people and industry?
As the Chief Minister makes desperate attempts to make sure that Singur is part of history, it appears one leader is intent on not letting that happen. Mamata Banerjee believes that the interest of the farmers whose land has been acquired is far more important. This is not to argue that the farmers should not get their due. Clearly, farmers must have their share. Some are realizing what Tata moving out of Singur could mean since there are some reports of protest, fearing a fall in land prices around the area.
It is no secret that West Bengal has been anything but the hottest destination for investors. The strongly entrenched trade unions have made sure that manufacturing industries are driven away from the state. Infosys, Wipro and some other tech companies are now looking at Kolkata as a destination, but getting the manufacturing industry to agree to set up shop is the state is easier said than done. Does her action make West Bengal a more attractive destination for investors?
Mamata Banerjee would have certainly served her supporters, and the farmers, better if she had focused on the real issues. She may believe that CPM has not done a good job of it in the last 31 years. If Tata Motors were to officially announce that it is moving out of Singur, there will be only one loser - the local population. Who benefits if Tata moves out of Singur?
When did we last see Mamata Banerjee take to the streets in the 88,853 square km of the state government territory, demanding better education and better healthcare for people? Take a look at the indicators and it will be clear that West Bengal is nowhere near the top.
According to the 2001 census, 13 states and five union territories have a literacy percentage better than West Bengal. The healthcare indicators are nothing to write home about too, though it is clearly showing an improving trend. But West Bengal is no where near the top. So, why not focus on the real issues, which will improve the lot of the people for sure? Lots of questions! It is a pity that politicians choose to give answers only when it suits them.
Source: http://profit.ndtv.com/2008/09/05222213/Singur-row-The-real-agenda.html
Even though things are bad for now, but this entire episode has a better side to it. The entire nation has been watching what is happening in Singur. Today MB must surely be knowing that she has been on anything but the right side. Singur farmers are gathering against her, her own party has started showing signs of unrest and she is beginning to take the softer stands. On the other hand we have seen the CM of West Bengal literally fall on his knees to beg people to let things go right for the Tatas. A Communist has openly questioned the validity of the strikes (though later the Godfathers and Godmothers forced him to apologize).
Singur has become an example. Next time something like this happens in any State, the CMs will be afraid. they will be forced to look beyond petty political motives and appreciate the larger good.
whatever happens, the sufferers have been the people on Singur. Whether because of the past incidences of violence and terror. Or whether because of what is happening now and what remains to come.