did u know???????

Submitted by ashwath on
Latest scientific estimates show that large dams in India are responsible for about a fifth of the India's total global warming impact. The estimates also reveal that Indian dams are the largest global warming contributors compared to all other nations. This shatters the myth that large hydro projects are a clean source of energy. This estimate by Prof Ivan Lima and colleagues from Brazil's National Institute for Space Research was recently published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. As per the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there are six global warming gases, of which large dams could be the source of three: methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide. Methane emission from human activities is known to contribute 23% to global warming. Methane emission from large Indian dams This study estimates that total methane emissions from India's large dams could be 33.5 million tonnes per annum, including emissions from reservoirs (1.1 MT), spillways (13.2 MT) and turbines of hydropower dams (19.2 MT). Total generation of methane from India's reservoirs could be 45.8 MT. The difference between the figures of methane generation and emission is due to the oxidation of methane as it rises from the bottom of a reservoir to its surface. The study had to make a number of assumptions in arriving at these estimates, as no measurements of the methane concentration or emission have been made for reservoirs in India. (Most measurements of methane emission from reservoirs have been done in Canada, Brazil and French Guyana.) Secondly, the data about the release of water from turbines and spillways of India's dams were not adequate; hence the estimates involved some further assumptions. The study estimates that emission of methane from all the reservoirs of the world could be 120 MT per annum. This means that of the total global emissions of methane due to all human activities, the contribution from large dams alone could be 24%. This study does not include the emission of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide from large dams. If all these are included, the global warming impact of large reservoirs would go up further. By these estimates, the methane emission from India's dams could be 27.86% of the methane emission from all the large dams of the world, which is more than the share of any other country. Patrick McCully, director of the International Rivers Network says, "Climate policy-makers have largely overlooked the importance of dam-generated methane. The IPCC urgently needs to address this issue." These latest round of studies should further help shatter the myth that power from large hydropower projects is clean. Indian hydropower projects are already known for their serious social and environmental impacts on the communities and environment. The fact that these projects also emit global warming gases in such significant proportion should further destroy the myth. Looking at the available figures for dams in India, total emission of methane from Indian dams may be somewhat overestimated. Even if we assume that methane emission from Indian dams is about half of what Prof Lima et al have estimated, it is still likely to be around 17 MT per annum. Even this more conservative figure means that India's dams emit about 425 CO2 equivalent MT (considering that Global Warming Potential over 100 years of a T of methane is equivalent to GWP of 25 T of CO2, as per the latest estimates of IPCC). This, when compared to India's official emission of 1849 CO2e MT in year 2000 (which does not include emission from large dams), the contribution of methane emission from large dams is 18.7% of the total CO2 emission from India. What needs to be done Neither the Central Water Commission, nor the Central Electricity Authority, both premier institutes of the Government of India, have assessed the global warming impact of India's large dams and implications thereof. The minimum first step one can expect from the government is to urgently institute a credible independent scientific study of the global warming impact of dams in India, in the light of findings elsewhere. The study should include the actual measurement of methane and other GHG emission from a sample of reservoirs. While making this assessment, it should also assess as to what extent methane emitted from reservoirs and hydropower projects can be recovered for beneficial use, in the process also reducing the global warming impact of the reservoirs. While assessing power and water resources development options, the greenhouse gas emission potential of dams should be assessed, as part of the cost benefit analysis and as part of environment impact assessment. The IPCC should initiate an independent study to assess the GHG potential of reservoirs in different parts of the world, including India. Emission of CO2 from reservoirs is already part of the mandatory reporting formats of IPCC. Reporting of methane emissions is suggested, but not mandated. The IPCC should make reporting of emission of methane from large dams mandatory

Comments

Submitted by tejasvi.adiga on Thu, 31-May-2007 - 14:31

Permalink

I didn't know that dams affected climate in this manner.. i only thought that during the construction of a dam large area of forest cover is destroted thus affecting the climate of that region.. This information is new..

Submitted by rajat on Fri, 01-Jun-2007 - 13:27

Permalink

I am not really sure on what to infer from this. Firstly, the study is too vague to provoke any logical thinking. Assumptions made are based on completely different geological, climatic and environmental conditions from India. Secondly, there is no comparison of any kind shown between this and the other alternate sources of energy generation/irrigation. There should be something that can be used to understand why situation is exacvtly bad in this case. Thirdly, no logical alternative or cure is suggested. There is no mention of a better system than the present one. I also fail to understand why dams in other nations are not so bad as their Indian counterparts. In case the author does not mean to say this, then some comparisons are required. But, the article does bring to our notice an important are to look upon. In my opinion, study of this type are not really relevant unless backed by concrete stuff, alternates and real life cases. Tomorrow a scientist might actually calculate the impact of human breathing on global warming. Without proper information on how large is the impact in the complete picture, we may find ourself dazed and breathless !!